Prof Fredrick Manthi in his field research at a site called Kanapoi 3 in Turkana County. Photo/Leakey Foundation.
By examining fossils, Prof Fredrick Kyalo Manthi
helps us understand how life on Earth has evolved over time. He is a leading
Kenyan palaeontologist and the Director of Antiquities, Sites, and Monuments at
the National Museums of Kenya. Born and raised in Makueni County, he last month
became only the second Kenyan ever inducted into the prestigious National
Academy of Sciences (NAS) of the United States. This is one of the highest honours a scientist can achieve
worldwide. Palaeontology is the study of ancient life through
fossils. Prof Manthi discusses
his work and how it related to
Kenya’s deeply rooted cultural
and religious traditions. He spoke with Star’s John
Muchangi.
In April you became the second Kenyan ever inducted into the National Academy of Sciences (NAS) of the United States, after Dr Meave Leakey in 2013. What does this mean to you personally and for Kenya?
It’s a huge honour for me,
for Kenya, and for the National Museums of Kenya. It’s a testimony that Kenyans
have come of age in research. This year, I was also the only one from Africa. I think in the whole of Africa, we are very few in the academy; It’s unlikely we are more than five.
Election into the academy is purely based on merit. I didn’t even know I had been nominated because you never
apply for it. Someone already in the academy must propose your name. I didn’t
know anybody would propose me. These are things you don’t even dream about because I
thought this was something preserved for Americans. Not because I’m a lesser
scientist, but because of how far removed we are from these institutions.
To this day, I don’t know who nominated me. They
never tell you. I can only speculate because I work with some colleagues who
are members, but I don’t know for sure.
This recognition gives hope to young scholars in
Africa and itt shows them they can reach the
highest levels of science. If I could do it, why not them?
It has inspired me even more to
support young Kenyan scientists, to encourage them to do good
science and collaborate widely. I actually asked what criteria they use to
elect people. I was told it’s not just your publications or discoveries. They also look at
how much you’ve done to promote science, your mentorship efforts, and how well
you collaborate globally.
Are you a team player? Do you create opportunities
for others? Are you generous with your time and knowledge? These things matter.
I was told that aside from my publications and
discoveries, I’ve done well in building collaborations between Kenyan
scientists and others globally, and in mentorship. So it’s not only about how
many papers you publish. It’s also about your contribution to the scientific
community.
So they probably also looked at your work
through the
Prehistory Club.
Yes. I founded the Prehistory Club in 2000. We’ve
been going to schools and colleges across Kenya, encouraging young people to
consider careers in paleosciences and science in general. We’ve engaged
thousands of students.
I never thought anyone noticed these efforts, but
it turns out they did. It taught me that even the little things we do –when done consistently and with sincerity –are seen. My brother, wherever you are, just do the
right thing.
I didn’t start the club to win awards. I did it
because I felt it was the right thing for the country and for the
future of palaeontology.
So what exactly motivated you to found the club?
I founded it after returning from the University of
Cape Town where I completed my bachelor’s degree. I was deeply struck by how
few Africans, especially Black Africans, were in palaeontology and archaeology
programmes. Almost all the students were white,
from South Africa and other countries.
I kept asking myself: What can we do to increase
African participation in palaeosciences?
That was the motivation behind the Prehistory Club.
I saw a need to engage more Kenyans. Back then, the number of African
researchers with PhDs in these fields was very small. So I believed creating a
platform to speak to students and raise awareness could make a difference – and it has.
I think your efforts to promote palaeosciences in Kenya come
up against strong religious traditions. Many conservative interpretations of
Christianity, for example, conflict with the scientific timeline of the earth and life. Many people also mistrust evolution because of its
historical misuse to justify racism and colonialism. How do you address these
issues?
Let me start by saying I don’t think there’s any
Kenyan who doesn’t appreciate science unless they’re just ignorant.
Even that pen you’re holding is a product of science. The phone calls we make,
our medicines, the hospitals we go to, it’s all
science.
Now, evolution is just the scientific way of
explaining how we came into being. Biology teaches that life began from a
single cell. But science doesn’t say where that cell came from. That’s where
the divine powers of God begin. Where science ends, faith begins.
Creation says God created man last. Science also
tells us the same: planets, stars, Earth came first,
and man came last. In evolutionary theory, man appears at the end. So, the two
aren’t in conflict. The only difference is the scale. Science talks in millions of years, while creation
doesn’t. But the Bible says a day for God could be a thousand years.
The Bible also gives us moral boundaries, for
instance, thou shall not kill, while science explains how things work.
They complement each other.
And remember, even our communities have origin
stories. The Kikuyu have Mumbi and Gikuyu,
the Kamba say we came from Nzaui, and the Luo have their own beliefs. These are
all ways of explaining our beginnings.
As scientists, we provide the scientific
explanation, supported by evidence from the fossil record.
Prof Fredrick Manthi, a palaeontologist, when he was inducted into the prestigious National Academy of Sciences
(NAS) of the United States last month. He is the Director of Antiquities, Sites, and Monuments at the National Museums of Kenya. How did your father’s work with Mary Leakey influence
your decision to pursue a career in palaeontology?
My dad used to bring home lots of books on
palaeontology. That exposure helped me know early on that this was what I wanted
to do.
By the time I was in high school I already knew I
wanted to pursue palaeontology. I went to a district school called Thomeandu Boys Secondary School in Makueni County.
It wasn’t a top school, but it shaped me. It doesn’t matter where you come from, you can still succeed.
That’s something I really want to emphasise. Your background does not define your destiny. If
you’re focused, work hard, and surround yourself with supportive people, you
can make it. I was lucky to get support especially from Prof Frank Brown
in the US. He identified my strengths and supported me throughout my studies.
What’s the entry point for a young person seeking a
career in palaeontology?
You need a strong foundation in sciences, such as
biology, physics, chemistry,
mathematics. If you’re leaning more towards archaeology, then history is also
important.But like my dad always told me: There are many
roads to Nairobi. You don’t have to take the shortest one to get there. You can
take a longer route and still arrive. So for young people, the key is to stay
focused, work hard, and keep good company. If someone doesn’t add value to your
life, it’s okay to walk away.
What defines your research interests currently?
My main focus is understanding the environments in
which early human ancestors lived. Where you live has a huge impact on your
success and survival.If your environment is harsh and you can’t adapt,
you risk extinction. Our ancestors lived in diverse ecosystems. Those that
failed to adapt went extinct.So I study the environmental context of evolution.
What kind of ecosystems did these species inhabit? The environment plays a
critical role. It influenced who survived and who didn’t.
Imagine taking you to the Sahara desert today. Without
adaptation you will not survive.
But we have developed technology that helps
us live in extreme conditions. Our ancestors didn’t have that privilege. They
were at the mercy of their environment.
Understanding past environments also helps us
protect today’s fauna. We have already lost many species due to
environmental changes so if we don’t act, we’ll lose even
more.
Could you mention some of your significant findings in Turkana and how this challenged previous
evolutionary theories?
Yes, we’ve made some remarkable discoveries. In
2000, working with Dr Meave Leakey, I discovered a fossil dating to about 1.55
million years ago. It was a homo erectus fossil.
This fossil, among others, helped show that homo
habilis and homo erectus coexisted for a long time, over a million years. That challenged the idea your
probably learnt in school of a
straight evolutionary path, where homo habilis gave rise to homo erectus in a
strict linear progression.
Now we know evolution is more complex. Species can
coexist. Some may die out, while others evolve further. This understanding came
from those discoveries in Turkana.
That fossil discovery earned me the Order of the
Burning Spear award from President Mwai Kibaki in 2007.
The US National Academy of Sciences explained that Prof Manthi’s work on ancient human ancestors and other species has led to many important advances in human origins research.
How is the application of ancient DNA research (the use of genetic
material from old biological samples to study past populations and species) in
the field of archaeology and palaeopathology?
Ancient DNA is a more recent study.
I know we’ve done a bit of that in Kenya, where we’ve analysed a number
of human populations. Ancient DNA cannot be tracked for a very long time,
especially those early fossils.
It’s been tracked in the more recent populations, like maybe 10,000
years ago, 8,000 years ago, or thereabout. But it has enabled us to track how
human populations have moved from point A to point B. It’s really helped us
advance our understanding about human evolution. It’s a more recent area of
study, but it’s grown pretty fast.
I have a question on the rodent fossils. How often
do they help us understand the ancient environment?
Great question. Rodents are incredibly important in
paleoenvironmental studies. They are very habitat-specific and live in highly
localised environments.
You’ll never see rodents migrating between regions
like Maasai Mara and Serengeti. They live in small areas, sometimes even just one bush.
Because they’re so localised, rodents give us a very accurate picture of what
an ancient environment was like. In one small area, you might find ten
different rodent species. That same area wouldn’t even support one elephant. So
the rodents give us a high-resolution signal of the ecosystem in which they
lived.
How does the NMK collaborate with local communities
to promote heritage conservation?
These communities are the ones living with the
heritage sites. In Turkana, for example, they wake up every day surrounded by
these sites.
We strive to involve them as much as possible in
conservation efforts. We want them to feel part of our work, because they are.
At NMK, we are only custodians of Kenya’s heritage, heritage that belongs to the people, and to
humanity. So we involve communities in all our programmes. We can’t do this work without them.
Many scientists say there is a greater appreciation
of science in the current government. Do you also think so?
Yes, I must say we are lucky right now. We have a president who is
aggressively championing the idea of Kenya as the cradle of humankind.
I really want to join President William Ruto in promotion of Kenya as
the home of human origins, because indeed we are the home of human origins. We
have wonderful fossils that document our ancestry as a species. From the last
seven million years ago all the way to the present, that record is in this
country.
And Kenyans should be proud of that record. We should be proud of that
heritage and use it even to really create jobs, have more visitors come to
visit the country, go to our sites across the country, go to our museums across
the country.
And you know, you cannot run away from science. Science is what’s causing all the innovations
and the big things happening in this world. The President is a scientist
himself and understands these things.